Rm. Kohl et Sa. Fisicaro, RESPONSE INTENTION AND IMAGERY PROCESSES - LOCUS, INTERACTION, AND CONTRIBUTION TO MOTOR LEARNING, Behavioral and brain sciences, 19(4), 1996, pp. 760
By way of commentary on Jeannerod (1994), we propose that (1) intentio
n, response imagery, and actual response processes carry equal weight
in inferring from one process to another, (2) memory networks control
intention, which interacts with imagery-based processing to control re
sponse imagery, and (3) response imagery will demonstrate learning eff
ects better when imagery reconstruction and elaboration are emphasized
and neutral retention tests are utilized.