T. Pirila et J. Nuutinen, ACOUSTIC RHINOMETRY, RHINOMANOMETRY AND THE AMOUNT OF NASAL SECRETIONIN THE CLINICAL MONITORING OF THE NASAL PROVOCATION TEST, Clinical and experimental allergy, 28(4), 1998, pp. 468-477
Background. The reliable interpretation of the nasal provocation test
in allergy diagnosis requires objective and measurable monitoring para
meters for clinical practice. The clinical usefulness of the nasal pro
vocation test has been limited by scanty knowledge of the specificity
and sensitivity of the test and a lack of reference values. Objective.
To test and compare three objective monitoring parameters of a nasal
provocation test in occupational allergic rhinitis. To evaluate the ma
gnitude of the nasonasal effects in a unilateral allergen challenge. M
ethods. The monitoring parameters of the nasal reaction were derived f
rom the minimum cross-sectional area on acoustic rhinometry, the nasal
resistance on active anterior rhinomanometry and the amount of nasal
secretion measured at 15 min intervals for 60 min. Twenty-three bovine
-allergic dairy and beef cattle farmers and 19 exposed, non-allergic c
ontrol subjects were challenged first with a control solution and then
with the cow allergen. Results. All the three monitoring parameters s
howed high specificity and sensitivity in finding allergic and non-all
ergic subjects. The secretion parameter was found to be slightly super
ior to the acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry parameters. The side
difference in the nasal response between the allergen-challenged and
the contralateral diluent-challenged cavity was significant for all th
e parameters among the allergic subjects. The contralateral secretion
amount was 1/3 of the ipsilateral secretion, indicating the magnitude
of the contralateral nasonasal reflex,a nasonasal reflex was also note
d in the nasal patency monitoring. The coefficient of variation was si
gnificantly lower for the acoustic rhinometry than for the rhinomanome
try (P = 0.0001). The optimal threshold values for a positive test wer
e a secretion amount of 100 mg, a 15% decrease in the minimum cross-se
ctional area and a 50% increase in the resistance for the observation
period of 30 min and correspondingly 210 mg, 30% and 100% for 60 min.
Conclusion. The low-pressure aspiration of the nasal secretion from th
e anterior part of the nasal cavity was found to be a reliable and pra
ctical monitoring parameter to be used together with acoustic rhinomet
ry or rhinomanometry in the nasal provocation test for clinical purpos
es. Although significant nasonasal effects took place in the unilatera
l allergen challenge, the response was more prominent in the allergen-
challenged than in the contralateral diluent-challenged nasal cavity i
n most allergic subjects.