Ab. Mikolon et al., EVALUATION OF NORTH-AMERICAN ANTIBODY DETECTION TESTS FOR DIAGNOSIS OF BRUCELLOSIS IN GOATS, Journal of clinical microbiology, 36(6), 1998, pp. 1716-1722
The sensitivities and specificities of 17 antibody detection tests for
brucellosis in goats were estimated. Tests evaluated included the U.S
. Department of Agriculture (USDA) card test with 8% cell concentratio
n (8%Card), USDA rapid automated presumptive test (RAP), Mexican rose
bengal plate tests with 8 and 3% cell concentrations (8%RB and 3%RB),
French rose bengal plate test with 4.5% cell concentration (4.5%RB), U
SDA standard plate test (SPT), USDA buffered acidified plate agglutina
tion test (BAPA), USDA and Mexican rivanol tests (URIV and MRIV), USDA
standard tube tests with Brucella abortus and Brucella melitensis ant
igens (SATA and SATM), serum enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
, USDA cold-fixation complement fixation tests with B. abortus and B.
melitensis antigens (CFA and CRM), USDA and Mexican milk ring tests (U
BRT and MBRT), and a milk ELISA. Test sensitivity was evaluated by usi
ng two groups of 10 goats experimentally infected with B. melitensis o
r B. abortus and monitored for 24 weeks. Specificity was evaluated by
using 200 brucellosis-free nonvaccinated goats from 10 California herd
s. The 3%RB was considered a good screening test because of high sensi
tivity at week 24 postinfection (90%), ease of performance, and low co
st. The cold-fixation CFA and CFM had 100% specificity in the field st
udy and were considered appropriate confirmatory tests. The milk ELISA
was significantly more sensitive (P < 0.05) than the UBRT and signifi
cantly more specific (P < 0.05) than the MBRT. The milk ELISA also had
the advantage of objectivity and ease of interpretation.