I. Findlay et al., COMPARISON OF FISH, PRINS, AND CONVENTIONAL AND FLUORESCENT PCR FOR SINGLE-CELL SEXING, SUITABILITY FOR PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS, Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 15(5), 1998, pp. 258-265
Purpose: Although conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was the
first method used for sexing in preimplantation genetic diagnosis, fl
uorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) has become the method of choice
. Recently two new techniques, primed in situ synthesis (PRINS) and fl
uorescent PCR, have been developed. This study compares the reliabilit
y and accuracy of these four techniques in single cells. Results: In b
uccal cells, fluorescent PCR and FISH had similar reliability (94 and
93%) and accuracy (97 and 96%) rates. The reliability and accuracy of
PRINS (91 and 25%) and conventional PCR (79 and 89%) were lower. In hu
man blastomeres, FISH and flourescent PCR had similar reliability (100
%, 7/7; 95%, 190/201) rates. Accuracy rates,cere 71 % (5/7) and 99% (1
88/190)for FISH and fluorescent PCR, respecticely, however; too few bl
astomeres were analyzed by FISH for meaningful comparison. However; wh
en these data are compared,with published data, the method of choice f
or blastomere sexing appears to be fluorescent PCR.Conclusions: Flouro
scent PCR has major implications for PGD.