OUTCOME OF THE CONTRALATERAL CAROTID-ARTERY IN PATIENTS HAVING UNDERGONE IPSILATERAL CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY - RESULTS OF SELECTIVE MANAGEMENT

Citation
Bg. Eklof et al., OUTCOME OF THE CONTRALATERAL CAROTID-ARTERY IN PATIENTS HAVING UNDERGONE IPSILATERAL CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY - RESULTS OF SELECTIVE MANAGEMENT, Vascular surgery, 32(3), 1998, pp. 221-232
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Peripheal Vascular Diseas
Journal title
ISSN journal
00422835
Volume
32
Issue
3
Year of publication
1998
Pages
221 - 232
Database
ISI
SICI code
0042-2835(1998)32:3<221:OOTCCI>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
Purposes: To evaluate the natural history of the carotid artery in pat ients who have undergone endarterectomy of the opposite carotid artery , study its relation to new neurologic events by clinical follow-up an d serial duplex scanning, review the literature for management guideli nes at present, and evaluate the impact on these guidelines from recen tly published prospective, randomized trials. Methods: A retrospective study of 275 consecutive patients who underwent carotid endarterectom y (CEA) from December 1985 through December 1992. Results: Of 275 pati ents, 115 were excluded (lost to follow-up, preoperative contralateral carotid occlusion, perioperative death or stroke) leaving 160 patient s as the final study group. Progression of contralateral stenosis from <50% to 50-79% occurred in 13/113 patients (11.5%), all asymptomatic; from 50-79% to 80-99% in 10/38 patients (26.3%), (two symptomatic-one transient ischemic attack [TIA] and one stroke-<50% to 80-99% in one patient who was asymptomatic); no patient progressed to total occlusio n. All nine patients with an initial contralateral stenosis 80-99% rem ained asymptomatic prior to subsequent CEA. Neurologic events referabl e to the contralateral carotid distribution occurred in 10 patients of 160 (6.3%) at a mean of 12.8 months after initial surgery, six TIAs a nd four strokes, none of which was heralded by TIA. Thus 24 patients s howed progression of stenosis, with two (8.3%) manifesting symptoms. O f the other 136 patients without progression of stenosis, eight (5.9%) developed symptoms. Conclusions: Our data and a review of the literat ure does not support an aggressive approach to the contralateral carot id artery stenosis. Based on NASCET and ACAS, however, new guidelines for management are suggested.