IS IMPEDANCE PLETHYSMOGRAPHY A SAFE TEST AFTER TOTAL JOINT REPLACEMENT

Citation
Dj. Dixon et al., IS IMPEDANCE PLETHYSMOGRAPHY A SAFE TEST AFTER TOTAL JOINT REPLACEMENT, Vascular surgery, 32(3), 1998, pp. 255-260
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Peripheal Vascular Diseas
Journal title
ISSN journal
00422835
Volume
32
Issue
3
Year of publication
1998
Pages
255 - 260
Database
ISI
SICI code
0042-2835(1998)32:3<255:IIPAST>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Screening for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) following total joint repla cement (TJR) has been recommended as an adjunct to DVT prophylaxis. Th is study evaluates a structured protocol utilizing impedance plethysmo graphy (IPG) as the primary screening modality. Over a 12-month period all patients undergoing TJR of the lower extremities had an IPC 3 to 5 days after surgery. Patients received primary DVT prophylaxis with w arfarin. Minimal follow up of 6 weeks was obtained on all patients. Th ree-hundred three TJRs were performed. The IPG appeared normal in 220 of 303 patients (73%), obviating further testing. During follow-up, tw o patients had thromboembolic disease (TED). Of the 83 seemingly abnor mal IPGs, 81 were false positive compared to venous ultrasound, with s ignificantly more after knee surgery (p < 0.001). There was one confir med DVT in the abnormal IPG group and one patient died 2 weeks after d ischarge with an autopsy-proven pulmonary embolism. There was a low ov erall rate of TED (1.3%); three fourths of patients with TED presented 2-4 weeks after discharge. These results indicate that it is clinical ly safe to discharge patients who have had a normal-appearing postoper ative IPG. However, the large number of false-positive results reduces the utility of the test, particularly after knee replacement. While I PG is safe and cheaper than venous ultrasound, prophylaxis extended be yond the of hospitalization may obviate the need for screening.