M. Hogben et D. Byrne, USING SOCIAL-LEARNING THEORY TO EXPLAIN INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN HUMAN-SEXUALITY, The Journal of sex research, 35(1), 1998, pp. 58-71
To explain individual differences in human sexual expression, investig
ators most often stress either physiological or experiential determina
nts. Psychologists commonly espouse some variant of learning theory (c
lassical conditioning, operant conditioning, or social beaming theory)
as an explanatory framework and a source of hypotheses and methodolog
y. The historical use of social learning theory is described in this a
rticle, and we review its central aspects and provide examples of sexu
ality research in which it plays a major role. Specifically we describ
e both early and current research in four broad topic areas: sexuality
development, adolescent sexuality and contraceptive use, health-relat
ed sexual behavior, and coercive sexuality Social learning theory is t
hen evaluated and compared with competing theories regarding its abili
ty to explain empirical data, its predictive utility, and its parsimon
y.