MECHANICAL COMPARISON OF BIPLANAR PROXIMAL CLOSING WEDGE OSTEOTOMY WITH PLANTAR PLATE FIXATION VERSUS CRESCENTIC OSTEOTOMY WITH SCREW FIXATION FOR THE CORRECTION OF METATARSUS PRIMUS VARUS
Jt. Campbell et al., MECHANICAL COMPARISON OF BIPLANAR PROXIMAL CLOSING WEDGE OSTEOTOMY WITH PLANTAR PLATE FIXATION VERSUS CRESCENTIC OSTEOTOMY WITH SCREW FIXATION FOR THE CORRECTION OF METATARSUS PRIMUS VARUS, Foot & ankle international, 19(5), 1998, pp. 293-299
Proximal crescentic metatarsal osteotomy is a clinically successful te
chnique for correcting metatarsus primus varus in hallux valgus surger
y. However, there have been instances of dorsal elevation of the metat
arsal head with this technique. Mechanical testing on 10 matched pairs
of cadaver feet was performed to evaluate a new technique combining a
biplanar closing wedge osteotomy and plantar plate fixation versus cr
escentic metatarsal osteotomy. The specimens were tested in cantilever
-bending mode on an MTS Mini Bionix test frame. The mean load-to-failu
re values were 127.2 +/- 81.9 N (SD) for biplanar osteotomy with plate
fixation and 44.9 +/- 43.3 N for crescentic osteotomy (P = 0.019); th
e mean stiffness values at the initial portion of the load-deflection
curve were 83.11 +/- 73.76 N/mm and 31.95 +/- 43.00 N/mm, respectively
(P = 0.012). The biplanar wedge osteotomy with plantar plate fixation
demonstrated significantly stronger fixation than the crescentic oste
otomy, with higher mean load-to-failure and stiffness values. this new
ly described technique may provide an acceptable alternative for patie
nts at risk for dorsal elevation of the metatarsal, particularly those
who are noncompliant or have osteopenia. Clinical study will determin
e whether this new technique offers satisfactory long-term results.