Nj. Barrow et al., EFFECT OF PREVIOUS ADDITIONS OF SUPERPHOSPHATE ON SORPTION OF PHOSPHATE, Australian Journal of Soil Research, 36(3), 1998, pp. 359-372
Samples of the topsoil were collected from plots of 8 field experiment
s which had been fertilised with P at several rates from 8 months to m
ore than 4 years previously. Phosphate sorption curves were measured a
nd described by the equation: S = ac(o)(b)-q where S indicates sorptio
n, c(o) observed concentration, and a, b, and q are parameters. From t
he fitted curves, sorption between 0.25 and 0.35 mg P/L and sorption a
t 0.3 mg P/L were calculated. Also measured were: the P retention inde
x (PRI), oxalate-extractable aluminium, oxalate-extractable iron, and
the pH of the soil measured in a sodium fluoride solution. The effects
of the applications of P on the sorption of newly added P differed be
tween sites. On 5 of the 8 sites, the slope term (a) of the fitted equ
ation decreased with increasing levels of previously applied P. Conseq
uently, the P buffering, measured as P sorbed between 0.25 and 0.35 mg
P/L, decreased. When the decrease in P buffering was large, the indir
ect measures of buffering capacity (oxalate-extractable aluminium, oxa
late-extractable iron, and the pH of the soil measured in sodium fluor
ide) also decreased. On the other 3 sites, the slope term did not decr
ease significantly. Indeed on one site there was a small increase. On
these 3 sites, the effect of the P application on the sorption curves
was largely shown by increases in the intercept term (q). The indirect
measures of P buffering sometimes increased with increasing applicati
on of P. On all sites, both the P sorbed at 0.3 mg P/L and the values
of PRI decreased with increasing P applications. This is because their
values are determined by the values of both a and q. We argue that th
e decreases in P buffering observed on 5 sites would increase the effe
ctiveness of subsequently added fertilisers and would limit the abilit
y of such soils to act as sinks for phosphate disposal. We suggest tha
t the differing behaviour on the other 3 sites may have occurred becau
se there was little continuing reaction between the soil and P.