In the two years after the imposition of the Smoot-Hawley tariff in Ju
ne 1930, the volume of U.S. imports fell over 40%. To what extent can
this collapse of trade be attributed to the tariff itself versus other
factors such as declining income or foreign retaliation? Partial and
general equilibrium assessments indicate that the Smoot-Hawley tariff
itself reduced imports by 4-8% (ceteris paribus), although the combina
tion of specific duties and deflation further raised the effective tar
iff and reduced imports an additional 8-10%. A counterfactual simulati
on suggests that nearly a quarter of the observed 40% decline in impor
ts can be attributed to the rise in the effective tariff (i.e., Smoot-
Hawley plus deflation).