Dl. Duewer et al., INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON OF AUTORADIOGRAPHIC DNA PROFILING MEASUREMENTS - PRECISION AND CONCORDANCE, Journal of forensic sciences, 43(3), 1998, pp. 465-471
Knowledge of the expected uncertainty in restriction fragment length p
olymorphism (RFLP) measurements is required for confident exchange of
such data among different laboratories. The total measurement uncertai
nty among all Technical Working Group for DNA Analysis Methods laborat
ories has previously been characterized and found to be acceptably sma
ll. Casework cell line control measurements provided by six Royal Cana
dian Mounted Police (RCMP) and 30 U.S. commercial, local, state, and F
ederal forensic laboratories enable quantitative determination of the
within-laboratory precision and among-laboratory concordance component
s of measurement uncertainty typical of both sets of laboratories. Mea
surement precision is the same in the two countries for DNA fragments
of size 1000 base pairs (bp) to 10,000 bp. However, the measurement co
ncordance among the RCMP laboratories is clearly superior to that with
in the U.S. forensic community. This result is attributable to the use
of a single analytical protocol in all RCMP laboratories. Concordance
among U.S. laboratories cannot be improved through simple mathematica
l adjustments. Community-wide efforts focused on improved concordance
may be the most efficient mechanism for further reduction of among-lab
oratory RFLP measurement uncertainty, should the resources required to
fully evaluate potential cross-jurisdictional matches become burdenso
me as the number of RFLP profiles on record increases.