ELECTROPHYSIOLOGIC CHARACTERISTICS AND RADIOFREQUENCY CATHETER ABLATION IN ATRIOVENTRICULAR NODE REENTRANT TACHYCARDIA WITH 2ND-DEGREE ATRIOVENTRICULAR-BLOCK
Sh. Lee et al., ELECTROPHYSIOLOGIC CHARACTERISTICS AND RADIOFREQUENCY CATHETER ABLATION IN ATRIOVENTRICULAR NODE REENTRANT TACHYCARDIA WITH 2ND-DEGREE ATRIOVENTRICULAR-BLOCK, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 8(5), 1997, pp. 502-511
Introduction: Detailed electrophysiologic study of AV nodal reentrant
tachycardia (AVNRT) with 2:1 AV block has been limited. Methods and Re
sults: Six hundred nine consecutive patients with AVNRT underwent elec
trophysiologic study and radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow
pathway. Twenty-six patients with 2:1 AV block during AVNRT were desig
nated as group I, and those without this particular finding were desig
nated as group II. The major findings of the present study were: (1) g
roup I patients had better anterograde and retrograde AV nodal functio
n, shorter tachycardia cycle length (during tachycardia with 1:1 condu
ction) (307 +/- 30 vs 360 +/- 58 msec, P < 0.001), and higher incidenc
e of transient bundle branch block during tachycardia (18/26 vs 43/609
, P < 0.001) than group II patients; (2) 21 (80.8%) group I patients h
ad alternans of AA intervals during AVNRT with 2:1 AV block. Longer AH
intervals (264 +/- 26 vs 253 +/- 27 msec, P = 0.031) were associated
with the blocked beats. However, similar HA intervals (51 +/- 12 vs 50
st 12 msec, P = 0.363) and similar HV intervals (53 +/- 11 vs 52 +/-
12, P = 0.834) were found in the blocked and conducted beats; (3) vent
ricular extrastimulation before or during the His-bundle refractory pe
riod bundle could convert 2:1 AV block to 1:1 AV conduction. Conclusio
ns: Fast reentrant circuit, rather than underlying impaired conduction
of the distal AV node or infranodal area, might account for second-de
gree AV block during AVNRT, Slow pathway ablation is safe and effectiv
e in patients who have AVNRT with 2:1 AV block.