S. Cant et U. Sharma, REFLEXIVITY, ETHNOGRAPHY AND THE PROFESSIONS (COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE)- WATCHING YOU WATCHING ME WATCHING YOU (AND WRITING ABOUT BOTH OF US), Sociological review, 46(2), 1998, pp. 244-263
That reflexivity is a characteristic of high modernity is now a truism
, but its ethical and practical implications for field research have n
ot been explored. The article is based on research conducted among com
plementary medical practitioners, focusing on issues of professionalis
ation. This research revealed the problematic and permeable nature of
boundaries in ethnographic work. For example, in the course of intervi
ews and observation therapists vouchsafed information to us which seem
ed controversial, even indiscreet. Was this a matter of their own naiv
ety, their failure to demonstrate the mature 'professionalism' to whic
h they aspired? Or was it a conscious strategy, conducted in the expec
tation that we would make such material public without attributing it
to them by name? We were obliged to reflect on the nature of our own '
professionalism' as researchers, the ways in which private and public
selves interact in the course of research. The confessional nature of
some ethnographic writing raises further issues about trust, privacy a
nd the preservation of professional boundaries between researcher and
researched. We conclude that social scientists are entitled to critiqu
e 'professionalism' as a historically situated 'folk' concept whose rh
etoric often obscures material interests, but they would do well not t
o abandon it themselves if they are to claim a responsible and ethical
form of practice.