COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF CEFTRIAXONE IN THE TREATMENT OF COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA IN ADULT HOSPITAL PATIENTS - A PHARMACO-ECONOMIC STUDY BASED ON A METAANALYSIS
F. Wessels et al., COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF CEFTRIAXONE IN THE TREATMENT OF COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA IN ADULT HOSPITAL PATIENTS - A PHARMACO-ECONOMIC STUDY BASED ON A METAANALYSIS, South African medical journal, 88(3), 1998, pp. 251-255
Objectives. A retrospective analysis was conducted to assess the cost-
effectiveness of four intravenous antibiotic treatment regimens in the
treatment of severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in adults in a
private hospital setting, The study compared some third-generation ce
phalosporin regimens with a second-generation cephalosporin and an amo
xiciilin/clavulanic acid (co-amoxiclav) regimen to investigate publish
ed South African treatment guidelines from a pharmacoeconomic point of
view. Method. A pharmaco-economic model of local costs, from a payer
perspective, was based on the results of a meta-analysis of clinical p
apers from peer-reviewed journals, The study compared intravenous (IV)
ceftriaxone (2 g once daily), cefotaxime (IV 2 g 3 times a day), cefu
roxime (IV 750 mg 3 times a day, followed by 500 mg orally 3 times a d
ay) and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (IV 750 mg 3 times a day, followed
by 625 mg orally 3 times a day). Results, An analysis of the odds rat
ios (ORs) of all two-way comparisons indicated that ceftriaxone ensure
d significantly higher probabilities of successful outcomes than the o
ther antibiotic treatment regimens (ORs in the order of two were indic
ated), The pharmaco-economic results suggested that the ceftriaxone tr
eatment regimen was the most cost-effective in the hospital treatment
of CAP in adult patients. These results proved to be robust across sen
sitivity analyses for success rates and treatment days. A sensitivity
analysis testing the assumption that patients could be discharged once
the oral treatment was initiated indicated that the amoxicillin/clavu
lanic acid and cefuroxime treatment arms were more cost-effective. The
clinical validity of such an assumption is questionable. Conclusion.
Despite the conservative approach followed in terms of ceftriaxone dat
a, both the clinical results and cost-effectiveness supported the use
of ceftriaxone setting.