S. Oddera et al., AIRWAY EOSINOPHILIC INFLAMMATION AND BRONCHIAL HYPERRESPONSIVENESS AFTER ALLERGEN INHALATION CHALLENGE IN ASTHMA, Lung, 176(4), 1998, pp. 237-247
Allergen exposure in atopic asthmatic patients is associated with recr
uitment and activation of eosinophils in the airways. Once activated,
eosinophils release toxic products, including the eosinophil cationic
protein (ECP), able to damage bronchial structures and to increase bro
nchial hyperresponsiveness. With this background, the present study wa
s designed to evaluate whether ECP levels in bronchoalveolar lavage (B
AL) fluid could reflect, better than BAL eosinophil counts, the cellul
ar activation that follows allergen exposure in atopic asthmatics. Twe
nty-two atopic patients attended the laboratory on two separate days.
On the Ist day, they underwent methacholine (MCh) inhalation challenge
to detect the degree of nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness. On
the 2nd day, they underwent fiberoptic bronchoscopy and BAL, at basel
ine or 4-6 h after allergen inhalation challenge. In this latter patie
nt group, MCh challenge was repeated 3-5 h after allergen challenge, 1
h before fiberoptic bronchoscopy. The analysis of the mean baseline F
EV, values and the degree of bronchial reactivity to MCh (MCh Pd-20) o
n the Ist study day did not demonstrate differences between the two pa
tient groups (p > 0.1, each comparison). In addition, in the allergen-
challenged group, MCh Pd-20 was decreased significantly after allergen
challenge (151.4 mu g/ml and 67.6 mu g/ml, respectively, before and a
fter challenge; p < 0.05). Evaluation of the different BAL cell types
demonstrated that the proportions of eosinophils and epithelial cells
were increased significantly in the allergen-challenged group compared
with the group evaluated at baseline (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respecti
vely). Moreover, ECP levels, corrected by the correspondent albumin le
vels (ECP/Alb), were higher in the allergen-challenged group compared
with the group evaluated at baseline (p < 0.05). In addition, although
a positive correlation was demonstrated between BAL eosinophil percen
tages and ECP/Alb values (r = 0.72, p < 0.05) in the group evaluated a
t baseline, no links were found between these parameters in the allerg
en-challenged group (p > 0.1). However, in this latter group, a weak p
ositive correlation was demonstrated between eosinophil percentages an
d Delta Mch, i.e., the increased nonspecific bronchial reactivity, whi
ch is observed after allergen challenge (r = 0.55; p < 0.05). Thus, in
stable asthmatic patients an ongoing activation of eosinophils parall
els their migration, but this eosinophilic inflammation is not strictl
y related to bronchial reactivity to Mch. By contrast, after allergen
inhalation challenge, eosinophil recruitment and activation seem to fo
llow different temporal kinetics, and eosinophilic inflammation may be
partially associated with the degree of airway hyperresponsiveness.