The primary objective of this paper is to explain current U.S. policy
on global climate change. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) efforts to i
mplement this policy will be described. A secondary objective of this
paper is to discuss from a U.S. perspective the social and political e
fforts which must be initiated in order for ocean storage of CO2 to be
considered as a viable CO2 mitigation option. The fact that the Frame
work Convention on Climate Change (FCCC) has not been successful in re
ducing greenhouse gas emissions is now recognized. Thus, U.S. policy h
as shifted towards the development of binding medium-term emissions ta
rgets and long-term atmosphere concentration goals. The U.S. believes
these goals can be accomplished through the adoption of cost-effective
joint implementation agreements and international emissions trading m
echanisms. Studies are currently underway to assess specific targets a
nd timetables for emissions reductions. Voluntary efforts on the part
of U.S. industry have proven to be extremely successful in reducing U.
S. CO2 emissions. The U.S. electric utility industry has taken the lea
d in voluntarily lowering greenhouse gas emissions under the DOE Clima
te Challenge Program. As of August, 1996, nearly 600 utility participa
nts, accounting for over 60% of electric power generation in the U.S.,
have joined the program. Areas of research interest to DOE include th
e development of high efficiency advanced power generation cycles and
CO2 sequestration technology. The U.S. currently spends $1.6 billion o
n understanding global climate phenomena and only $1.6 million on CO2
mitigation research. A number of socio-political considerations must b
e looked at in assessing the feasibility of ocean storage of CO2. Deve
loping public trust appears to be a major concern in establishing the
acceptability of ocean storage. Uncertainties in the effects of CO2 on
marine life, potential safety hazards associated with pipelining, and
ship transport of CO2 are all issues which must be dealt with as soon
as possible. Some hidden costs associated with ocean disposal will al
so be discussed. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.