A. Shakespeare et G. Simeon, ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS OF EPILEPSY TREATMENT - A COST MINIMIZATION ANALYSIS COMPARING CARBAMAZEPINE AND LAMOTRIGINE IN THE UK, Seizure, 7(2), 1998, pp. 119-125
New anti-epileptic drugs differ from existing standard therapies not i
n their clinical efficacy, but in their side-effects profiles. To dete
rmine the relative economic value of these agents, one must compare dr
ug costs, costs Of resources employed in the management of adverse eve
nts, and costs associated with therapeutic switching. In this economic
analysis, carbamazepine (CBZ) and lamotrigine (LTG) are evaluated in
monotherapy treatment of partial and/or general tonic-clonic seizures
in the UK. Adverse event and tolerability data are obtained from a pub
lished randomized controlled trial of CBZ vs. LTG. A Delphi panel of c
linicians advised treatment patterns for adverse events. Cost data are
obtained from public sources. Results show that CBZ therapy costs abo
ut one-third of LTG therapy (pound 179 for CBZ vs. pound 522 for LTG)
even after the costs associated with the management of adverse events
and therapeutic switching are considered.