THE DISCRIMINATING POWER OF A RISK SCORE FOR POSTOPERATIVE VOMITING IN ADULTS UNDERGOING VARIOUS TYPES OF SURGERY

Citation
Cc. Apfel et al., THE DISCRIMINATING POWER OF A RISK SCORE FOR POSTOPERATIVE VOMITING IN ADULTS UNDERGOING VARIOUS TYPES OF SURGERY, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 42(5), 1998, pp. 502-509
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Anesthesiology
ISSN journal
00015172
Volume
42
Issue
5
Year of publication
1998
Pages
502 - 509
Database
ISI
SICI code
0001-5172(1998)42:5<502:TDPOAR>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
Background: Recently, we have demonstrated that the probability of pos toperative vomiting (PV) following ENT surgery with inhalational anaes thetics can be predicted using a risk score. This score is based on ge nder, age, smoking status, history of motion sickness or postoperative nausea and vomiting and the duration of anaesthesia. Therefore, it is of interest whether this score is also accurate in predicting PV in p atients undergoing different types of surgery. Methods: Inpatients sch eduled for bone, vascular, general or eye surgery were included in a p rospective survey for PV over 24 h. Data of 1091 patients were analyze d, of which 542 were used for the validation of the previously constru cted risk score (Score I). The data of the remaining 549 patients were used to evaluate the risk factors that contribute to PV in this setti ng and to develop a new score (Score II). The discriminating power of both scores to predict PV was tested in the validation set (n=542) and compared by calculating the area under the receiver operating charact eristic (ROC) curves. Results: The area under the ROC curve of Score I was 0.77 (SD 0.024). Risk factors for PV in the evaluation set were f emale gender, young age, history of motion sickness or postoperative n ausea and vomiting and the type of surgery. The area under the curve o f Score II was 0.75 (SD 0.026) and was not significantly different fro m Score I (P=0.57). Conclusion: Score I was accurate in predicting PV in patients after most types of surgery with volatile anaesthetics, wh ich suggests that this score might be useful for other centres as well .