Background: As no clinical randomised studies have previously been per
formed comparing complications with the Ciaglia Percutaneous Dilatatio
nal Tracheostomy Introducer Set (PDT) and conventional surgical trache
ostomy (TR), we designed a study with the aim of comparing the efficac
y and safety of the two techniques. Methods: Sixty patients selected f
or elective tracheostomy were randomised for either PDT (30 patients)
or TR (30 patients). All patients had general anaesthesia and were ven
tilated with 100% oxygen. Furthermore, lidocaine with epinephrine 1% (
3-5 ml) was used for local analgesia and to minimise bleeding during t
he procedure. Results: The median time for insertion of the tracheosto
my tube was 11.5 min (range 7-24 min) in the PDT group and 15 min (ran
ge 5-47 min) in the TR group (P<0.01). Complications during the proced
ure were cuff puncture of the endotracheal tube in 5 cases in the PDT
group. Minor bleeding was encountered in 6 cases in the PDT group as o
pposed to 24 cases in the TR group (P<0.01), major bleeding in none ve
rsus 2 cases, respectively. In 8 cases in the PDT group, increased res
istance to insertion of the tracheostomy tube was met by further dilat
ation. During the post-tracheostomy period, complications occurred wit
h minor bleeding in 2 cases in the PDT group as opposed to 9 cases in
the TR group (P<0.05), and major bleeding was encountered in 1 case in
each group. Minor infections were encountered in 3 cases in the PDT g
roup as opposed to 11 cases in the TR group (P<0.01). Major infection
was encountered in none versus 8 cases, respectively (P<0.01). Conclus
ion: Our results indicate that the percutaneous dilatational tracheost
omy technique performed with the Ciaglia Introducer Set is effective,
safe and superior to conventional surgical tracheostomy as immediate c
omplications as well as complications with the tracheostomy tube in si
tu are fewer and of less severity.