RAPID AND PROGNOSTICALLY VALID QUANTIFICATION OF IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL REACTIONS BY IMMUNOHISTOMETRY OF THE MOST POSITIVE TUMOR FOCUS - A PROSPECTIVE FOLLOW-UP-STUDY ON BREAST-CANCER USING ANTIBODIES AGAINST MIB-1, PCNA, ER, AND PR
S. Biesterfeld et al., RAPID AND PROGNOSTICALLY VALID QUANTIFICATION OF IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL REACTIONS BY IMMUNOHISTOMETRY OF THE MOST POSITIVE TUMOR FOCUS - A PROSPECTIVE FOLLOW-UP-STUDY ON BREAST-CANCER USING ANTIBODIES AGAINST MIB-1, PCNA, ER, AND PR, Journal of pathology, 185(1), 1998, pp. 25-31
The prognostic significance of immunohistochemical markers for cell pr
oliferation [MIB-1, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)I and hor
mone receptor analysis [oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor
(PR)] was tested by means of immunohistometry in a series of 103 brea
st cancer patients in comparison with the lymph node status N, the tum
our size T, histomorphological grading and the biochemical ER and PR s
tatus. Immunohistochemical reactions mere performed on 2 mu m sections
from paraffin-embedded tissue, using an indirect peroxidase method. T
he proportion of immunostained tumour cell nuclei mas determined using
a TV-image analysis system. Measurements were performed using a 20 x
objective on 40 viewing fields (1.94 mm(2), MIB-1 and PCNA) or 20 view
ing fields (0.97 mm(2), ER and PR). The mean immunopositivity of all v
iewing fields and the value of the most immunopositive viewing field (
MIB-1(max), PCNA(max), PRmax, ERmax) mere calculated. The mean values
and the maximal values mere highly correlated (r=0.903, P<0.001). Afte
r 1:2:1 quantilization, 84.2 per cent of the 412 single measurements r
evealed mean and maximal values in the same category (P<0.0001). For e
ach of the four immunohistochemical markers, the prognostic significan
ce of the maximal values was higher than that of the mean values. The
highest prognostic significance mas found for MIC-1(max) (P=0.0002), f
ollowed by PRmax (P=0.0046), ERmax (P=0.0154), and PCNA(max) (P=0.0161
). From the results of a Cox model, a 'prognostic index (PI)' mas deve
loped, ranging from -1 to 8: PI=2 x N+T+MIB-1(max)-PRmax. The four gro
ups of patients with PI values of <2, 2-3, 4-5, and >5 revealed signif
icantly different 7.5-year survival probabilities (P<0.0001). The simp
licity of the PI makes it a clinically useful, routinely applicable, a
nd understandable parameter in the surgical pathology of breast carcin
oma. (C) 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.