Wp. Robinson et al., TRUTH, EQUIVOCATION CONCEALMENT AND LIES IN JOB APPLICATIONS AND DOCTOR-PATIENT COMMUNICATION/, Journal of language and social psychology, 17(2), 1998, pp. 149-164
Our concern was to explore two institutional contexts in which telling
the truth, equivocating, and lying could each carry costs: applicants
not getting a ob and doctors coping with distressed patients. For the
job interviews, applicants could be truthful, lie, or equivocate abou
t personal qualities specified as necessary in the job description. Th
e chances of detection were varied. The bias was toward truth telling,
but in one condition, its incidence dropped to 52%. Lying and equivoc
ation/concealment were preferred equally. For the medical scenarios, s
tories were varied to match Bok's suggestions about conditions that co
uld encourage doctors not to be truthful. Truth telling was preferred
universally. Lying was seen as wrong, as was equivocation. Within, the
se constraints, however, the variances across Kinds of patient and out
come were associated with Bok's expectations.