Ae. Jarlov et al., OBSERVER VARIATION IN THE CLINICAL AND LABORATORY EVALUATION OF PATIENTS WITH THYROID-DYSFUNCTION AND GOITER, Thyroid, 8(5), 1998, pp. 393-398
Three endocrinologists assessed thyroid function (hypothyroid, possibl
y hypothyroid, euthyroid, possibly hyperthyroid, or hyperthyroid), thy
roid size (small, medium, or large), thyroid type (diffuse, nodular, o
r solitary nodule), and diagnosis and treatment options in 55 patients
(47 women and 8 men) with a median age of 43 years (range 19 to 74) s
uspected of thyroid disease. The observers were presented stepwise for
the (1) patient, clinical examination, and patient history; (2) blood
tests; (3) Tc-99m-pertechnetate scintigraphy; and (4) ultrasonography
. The reproducibility was assessed by means of the kappa coefficient.
Compared with evaluation of the patient alone, agreement on thyroid dy
sfunction was almost perfect when the results of the blood tests were
known. The kappa values for pairs of observers rose significantly from
0.55 to 0.65 to 0.88 to 0.93. All three observers altered their opini
on as to thyroid dysfunction in one third of the patients when the blo
od tests were known. Compared with evaluation of the patient alone, ag
reement on the morphology of the thyroid gland did not improve signifi
cantly in spite of access to thyroid scintigraphy; with the addition o
f thyroid ultrasound, agreement improved significantly for some pairs
of observers. The three observers agreed on the rough estimate of thyr
oid size in only 36% of the patients. When all information was availab
le, the three observers agreed on diagnosis and treatment category in
60% of the patients. Doctors should bear in mind the considerable obse
rver variation when they evaluate patients with suspected thyroid dise
ase.