The present study examined (1) whether the neostriatum is involved in
a drug-induced conditioned locomotor response and; (2) whether this st
ructure participates in the development of behavioral sensitization. M
oreover, the present study addressed the question whether the developm
ent of behavioral sensitization is necessary for the induction of cond
itioning. Rats received injections of either apomorphine (2 mu g) or v
ehicle (solution of 0.1% ascorbate/saline) into the dorsal neostriatum
daily for 7 days. These treatments were performed immediately prior t
o (apomorphine-paired group and vehicle group) or 30 min following (ap
omorphine-unpaired group) 10-min placement in an open field which serv
ed as the test environment. After a 3-day drug withdrawal period, the
animals were given a 10-min non-drug vehicle test trial in the test en
vironment. Three days later, a drug test with apomorphine was administ
ered to the animals of the paired and unpaired treatment groups; the v
ehicle group again received an injection of vehicle. The analysis of l
ocomotor activity in the open field (measured as the distance traverse
d) revealed that locomotor activity in the apomorphine-paired group wa
s higher than in the other groups. There were no indications for behav
ioral sensitization to intrastriatal apomorphine, since the locomotor
response in the apomorphine-paired group did not increase, but rather
decreased with daily repeated injections of apomorphine. Furthermore,
only the apomorphine-paired animals showed a higher locomotor response
when tested after an intrastriatal injection of vehicle in the previo
usly apomorphine-paired environment, which is indicative of a conditio
ned drug effect. These results suggest that the neostriatum is directl
y involved in the development of drug-induced conditioning of locomoto
r behavior but not in the establishment of behavioral sensitization. (
C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.