SHORT-TERM VARIATION IN THE BODY-WEIGHT OF OYSTERCATCHERS HAEMATOPUS-OSTRALEGUS - EFFECT OF AVAILABLE FEEDING TIME BY DAY AND NIGHT, TEMPERATURE AND WIND FORCE
L. Zwarts et al., SHORT-TERM VARIATION IN THE BODY-WEIGHT OF OYSTERCATCHERS HAEMATOPUS-OSTRALEGUS - EFFECT OF AVAILABLE FEEDING TIME BY DAY AND NIGHT, TEMPERATURE AND WIND FORCE, Ardea, 84A, 1996, pp. 357-372
The available feeding time of coastal Oystercatchers varies from day t
o day due to the effect of wind direction and wind force on the water
level. If the birds are not able to feed at all during a day, they los
e 30 g, or 6% of their body weight. The body weight increases with the
duration of the available feeding time, irrespective whether it is da
y or night. Oystercatchers continue to feed at night, at least in autu
mn and winter. Although wind force and wind direction affect the daily
duration of the available feeding time, this variation fades away if
calculated over a number of days, and therefore does not affect the bi
rds in the long-term. Does the body weight increase, or decrease, with
the higher costs of living associated with low temperatures and stron
g winds? A decrease in body weight with increased cost of living would
suggest. that the birds are not able to find the extra food required
to compensate for the higher maintenance level ('undercompensation').
An increase in body weight, on the other hand, would suggest that the
birds in these difficult circumstances eat even more than needed in or
der to increase their body reserves in cases still worse conditions ar
rive ('overcompensation'). Unfortunately, the field data are confusing
. The weak increase in body weight at low temperatures suggests an ove
rcompensation, but the observed clear decrease in body weight with str
ong winds suggests an undercompensation. However, the increase of body
weight with lower temperature is not large and is possibly due to int
ervening variables, so it is not clear whether this was an actual over
compensation. The negative effect of wind force on body weight is pres
umably caused by undercompensation in combination with a decrease in t
he feeding success.