BIOCONCENTRATION KINETICS OF CHLOROBENZENES AND THE ORGANOPHOSPHORUS PESTICIDE CHLORTHION IN THE POND SNAIL LYMNAEA-STAGNALIS - A COMPARISON WITH THE GUPPY POECILIA-RETICULATA

Bioconcentration factors and uptake and elimination rate constants are determined for seven chlorobenzenes and for the organophosphorus pest icide chlorthion in the pond snail Lymnaea stagnalis. The toxicokineti c parameters are related to octanol-water partition coefficients (K-ow ) and compared with literature data for the guppy (Poecilia reticulata ). In contrast to the guppy, uptake rate constants for chlorobenzenes in the pond snail increase proportionately with K-ow in the pond snail . Elimination rate constants decrease with increasing K-ow values, sim ilarly to the guppy. Absolute elimination rate constants, however, are higher than in the guppy. For the pond snail, the relationship betwee n bioconcentration factors of chlorobenzenes and hydrophobicity is des cribed as: log BCF = 1.97 log K-ow -7.45 (r(2) = 0.93). The slope of t his relationship is remarkably steeper than for the guppy and aquatic organisms in general. Bioconcentration kinetics of clorthion in the po nd snail do not suggest a significant impact of biotransformation. By means of the application of the fish kinetic bioconcentration model, d ifferences in the kinetic behaviour of chlorobenzenes in the guppy and the pond snail are examined with respect to differences in their weig ht, surface area and lipid content. The observed higher elimination ra tes in the pond snail are reasonably well predicted by the model and c an as such be explained by its lower lipid content in combination with its slightly lower surface to mass ratio. Uptake rate constants of th e lower chlorinated benzenes in the pond snail are substantially overe stimated by the model. Furthermore, the model seems incompetent to des cribe their dependency on hydro phobicity. The insufficiencies of the model are discussed with respect to possibly inaccurate assumptions in parametrization of the model and to the model itself, being founded o n first-order one-compartment kinetics and diffusive mass transfer. Pr otein binding is suggested to be most likely responsible for the obser ved discrepancies. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.