Fm. Howard, THE ROLE OF LAPAROSCOPY IN THE EVALUATION OF CHRONIC PELVIC PAIN - PITFALLS WITH A NEGATIVE LAPAROSCOPY, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, 4(1), 1996, pp. 85-94
Laparoscopic findings are negative in anywhere from 10% to 90% of wome
n with chronic pelvic pain. When this occurs a woman is often told one
or more of the following: (1) nothing is wrong; (2) the pain is in he
r head and she should see a psychiatrist; (3) she should have a neurol
ytic procedure, such as uterine nerve transection or presacral neurect
omy; (4) the only thing that is left to do is a hysterectomy; or (5) n
othing can be done and she must learn to live with the pain. Usually t
hese statements are inappropriate, often stemming from the mistaken be
lief that laparoscopy represents the definitive diagnostic end point i
n the evaluation of a woman with chronic pelvic pain. It is important
that gynecologists appreciate that laparoscopy is only one of many pos
sible methods of evaluation and recognize ifs diagnostic limitations a
nd pitfalls.