SOME PRACTICAL NOTES ON THE PARAMETER KB(-1) FOR SPARSE VEGETATION

Citation
A. Verhoef et al., SOME PRACTICAL NOTES ON THE PARAMETER KB(-1) FOR SPARSE VEGETATION, Journal of applied meteorology, 36(5), 1997, pp. 560-572
Citations number
49
Categorie Soggetti
Metereology & Atmospheric Sciences
ISSN journal
08948763
Volume
36
Issue
5
Year of publication
1997
Pages
560 - 572
Database
ISI
SICI code
0894-8763(1997)36:5<560:SPNOTP>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
This paper deals with the parameter kB(-1), the logarithm of the ratio between momentum and heat roughness length, of sparsely vegetated sur faces and hare soil. The bare soil surface is included as a reference, since it is fairly homogenous and smooth, having no distinguishable r oughness elements. The mean value of kB(-1) is about 8 for the vineyar d and 12 for the savannah. These values are significantly greater than kB(-1) = 2, which is usually assumed to hold for vegetation. The mean value of kB(-1) for bare soil is small and negative, which agrees wit h the literature. A large variation of kB(-1) during the day is measur ed for all three surfaces. This behavior has been observed for sparse vegetation in previous studies. Some authors explained the phenomenon with a vertical movement of the source of heat through the day as sola r angle varies, or with the use of an inappropriate value of effective surface temperature to calculate kB(-1). For the first time. this diu rnal variation is measured for a smooth surface, the hare soil, for wh ich neither explanation is valid. A sensitivity study reveals that the calculated kB(-1) is very sensitive to measuring errors in the microm eteorological variables and errors in the roughness length for momentu m. This explains the large range in observed kB(-1) values for one par ticular surface type. In addition, several semiempirical expressions f or kB(-1) from the literature are tested. Two well-established formula s, both based on a simple combination of Reynolds and Prandtl numbers. appear to produce the best estimates of daily averaged kB(-1) values. None of the formulas are able to describe the diurnal variation. The authors conclude that the concept of kB(-1) is questionable as it is b ased upon extrapolating a theoretical profile through a region where t his profile does not hold. reward a ''surface temperature'' that is di fficult to define and to measure. It should therefore be avoided in me teorological models, for example, by applying canopy boundary layer re sistances. Unfortunately, In remote sensing, the bulk transfer equatio ns are up to now the only option, which therefore requires the use of kB(-1).