ACCEPTANCE OF EMPLACEMENT HOLE POSITIONS - STAGE-1 THERMOMECHANICAL STUDY

Authors
Citation
H. Hokmark, ACCEPTANCE OF EMPLACEMENT HOLE POSITIONS - STAGE-1 THERMOMECHANICAL STUDY, Engineering geology, 49(3-4), 1998, pp. 215-222
Citations number
7
Categorie Soggetti
Engineering, Geological
Journal title
ISSN journal
00137952
Volume
49
Issue
3-4
Year of publication
1998
Pages
215 - 222
Database
ISI
SICI code
0013-7952(1998)49:3-4<215:AOEHP->2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
The fraction of intended emplacement hole positions along a KBS3-type nuclear waste deposition tunnel that can actually be used for depositi on of waste canisters will be an important issue during different stag es of decision-making within the repository site selection, design and construction phases. Some criteria for rejecting positions will deal with long-time performance aspects, e.g. expected post-closure groundw ater flow in fractures that intersect the deposition hole and connect to the tunnel or to nearby major fracture zones. Other criteria will b e concerned with construction aspects, e.g. inflow into the open depos ition hole during construction and emplacement, or the mechanical stab ility of the deposition hole walls. Acceptance or rejection of individ ual deposition hole positions will depend on the expected consequences of a number of processes: excavation of tunnel and emplacement hole, interaction with the swelling bentonite buffer, heating and subsequent cooling. Additional, hypothetical processes include effects of glacia tion and seismic events. The consequences of these processes will depe nd on the arrangement of fractures in the nearfield, on the mechanical properties of the nearfield- and farfield rock, and on the initial st ress field. This paper deals with the first stage of an ongoing numeri cal thermomechanical study, aimed at providing consequence description s that are relevant on the tunnel- and deposition hole scale. The resu lts regard results from continuum analyses. Comparisons are made with recently developed analytical solutions for the temperature field and the thermoelastic stress- and strain fields around and within the volu me occupied by the repository. The discussion focuses on the relevance of the results and the applicability of the numerical method. (C) 199 8 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.