CAPITAL STRUCTURE, PRIORITY RULES, AND THE SETTLEMENT OF CIVIL CLAIMS

Authors
Citation
Ke. Spier et Ao. Sykes, CAPITAL STRUCTURE, PRIORITY RULES, AND THE SETTLEMENT OF CIVIL CLAIMS, International review of law and economics, 18(2), 1998, pp. 187-200
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Economics,Law
ISSN journal
01448188
Volume
18
Issue
2
Year of publication
1998
Pages
187 - 200
Database
ISI
SICI code
0144-8188(1998)18:2<187:CSPRAT>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Capital structure affects the bargaining position of a firm in the set tlement of civil litigation when the civil judgment may cause the firm to become insolvent. We analyze this pretrial bargaining game under d ifferent bankruptcy priority rules. A leveraged capital structure can benefit the firm's shareholders for two reasons. Most obviously, if th e civil plaintiff will not receive top priority in bankruptcy, debt ma y serve to directly dilute the value of die civil claim. A more subtle effect, however, arises because the cost of a large civil judgment ma y be borne by the debtholders in bankruptcy. This can make the shareho lders into tougher bargainers by narrowing the settlement range. This latter effect implies that even unsecured debt may be used strategical ly to dilute the value of civil claims, even when the civil plaintiff is given priority in bankruptcy. Welfare and legal implications are di scussed. (C) 1998 by Elsevier Science Inc.