Ke. Spier et Ao. Sykes, CAPITAL STRUCTURE, PRIORITY RULES, AND THE SETTLEMENT OF CIVIL CLAIMS, International review of law and economics, 18(2), 1998, pp. 187-200
Capital structure affects the bargaining position of a firm in the set
tlement of civil litigation when the civil judgment may cause the firm
to become insolvent. We analyze this pretrial bargaining game under d
ifferent bankruptcy priority rules. A leveraged capital structure can
benefit the firm's shareholders for two reasons. Most obviously, if th
e civil plaintiff will not receive top priority in bankruptcy, debt ma
y serve to directly dilute the value of die civil claim. A more subtle
effect, however, arises because the cost of a large civil judgment ma
y be borne by the debtholders in bankruptcy. This can make the shareho
lders into tougher bargainers by narrowing the settlement range. This
latter effect implies that even unsecured debt may be used strategical
ly to dilute the value of civil claims, even when the civil plaintiff
is given priority in bankruptcy. Welfare and legal implications are di
scussed. (C) 1998 by Elsevier Science Inc.