Mj. Wishart et Br. Davies, THE INCREASING DIVIDE BETWEEN FIRST-WORLD AND THIRD-WORLD - SCIENCE, COLLABORATION AND CONSERVATION OF THIRD-WORLD AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS, Freshwater Biology, 39(3), 1998, pp. 557-567
1. Ten of the leading journals in the field of freshwater ecology were
identified using the Science Citation Index's Journal Citation Report
s. These journals were surveyed to assess the levels and patterns of c
ollaboration in research initiatives in regions of the Third World. Me
mbership demographics of five professional societies in this field wer
e also examined to elucidate distribution patterns of practitioners in
the field. 2. In total, 8960 papers were surveyed, of which only fort
y were published in a language other than English. Senior authors came
from 114 of the 130 different countries listed among authors' address
es. Of these, forty-five were from Third World countries and sixty-nin
e from the First World. Five countries were responsible for 60.64% of
the papers submitted; the United States = 25.65%; Canada = 11.55%; Aus
tralia = 10.15%; the United Kingdom = 6.73%; New Zealand = 6.56%. Mult
i-authored papers accounted for 73.05% of all papers. 3. Papers by aut
hors from Third World countries accounted for only 10.93% of single-au
thor papers and less than 10% of multi-authored papers. Collaboration
was found in 73.05% of the papers surveyed, the vast majority of which
(87.39%) was between authors from First World countries. Only 825 (9.
21%) of the papers surveyed involved authors from different countries.
Most of this collaboration (72.36%) was between authors from differen
t First World countries. 4. Some 1038 papers surveyed included researc
h undertaken in, or included authors from, Third World countries. The
majority of these papers (69.08%) were submitted by authors from Third
World countries, involving either multiple or single authorship. The
third most common publication relating to research in Third World regi
ons (17.4%) came from single-author papers in which the authors were f
rom a First World country. Only four of the papers surveyed were submi
tted by single authors from Third World countries working in First Wor
ld countries. 5. There is a disproportionate representation of taxonom
ic (20.3%) and marine (10.5%) papers from the Third World regions in c
omparison to both lentic (8.0%) and lotic (7.4%) papers. 6. Membership
demographics of the professional societies surveyed continue to refle
ct the historical origins of freshwater ecology. More than 80% of memb
ers in the three largest societies examined are registered in Europe a
nd North America, while membership of the remaining societies remains
largely regional. 7. It is argued that present levels of collaboration
and technology transfer from the First World to the Third World are i
nadequate and that, given the widening gulf in terms of personnel and
resources, the future of essential research on inland waters in the Th
ird World does not bode well unless in situ capacity building within T
hird World countries becomes a target of First World research and fund
ing agencies.