The literature on excess entry shows that the free-entry equilibrium n
umber of firms may be greater than is socially optimal, and proposes g
overnment entry regulation as a remedy, This article tries to show tha
t such a policy recommendation is misleading. A two-period, three-pers
on entry game model, which explicitly includes second-best government,
shows that entry regulation aimed at preventing excess entry actually
induces the incumbent to behave strategically against the government
and makes the final outcome socially suboptimal compared to cases in w
hich there is no government intervention. Entry regulation is subgame
optimal; however, it is globally suboptimal.