M. Marchand et al., 12-YEAR EXPERIENCE WITH CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT PERICARDIAL VALVE IN THE MITRAL POSITION - A MULTICENTER STUDY, Journal of heart valve disease, 7(3), 1998, pp. 292-298
Background and aims of the study: The study aim was to assess the dura
bility of the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT pericardial bioprosthesis i
n the mitral position. Methods: This seven-center retrospective clinic
al study involved the follow up of 333 patients who underwent isolated
mitral valve replacement and 102 patients who underwent double (mitra
l and aortic) valve replacement with the PERIMOUNT pericardial valve b
etween 1984 and 1989. Mean patient age at implant was 60.7 +/- 11.6 ye
ars; 41.1% were males. The most common etiology was rheumatic heart di
sease (53.9%) and the most common mechanism mitral insufficiency. All
patients but six were followed for an average of 7.2 +/- 3.6 years aft
er surgery; total follow up was 3071.7 patient-years (pt-yr). Results:
The total operative mortality rate was 7.6%; this included a valve-re
lated mortality rate of 0.2%. The late mortality rate was 5.2% per pt-
yr, of which 1.4% per pt-yr was considered valve-related. At 11 years,
the overall actuarial survival rate was 53.3 +/- 2.8%, and actuarial
freedom from valve-related death 83.9 +/- 2.6%. At follow up, 80% of p
atients were in NYHA class I or II, and 74% showed improvement. Twenty
-eight incidences of deterioration requiring explant were observed. At
11 years the actuarial freedom from explant due to structural failure
was 84.9 +/- 3.1%. Rates of structural failure decreased with age: th
e actuarial freedom from explant due to structural failure was 78.1 +/
- 4.8% for patients aged less than or equal to 60 years, 89.4 +/- 4.4%
for those aged 61-70 years, and 100% for those aged over 71 years. Co
nclusion: The Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT pericardial bioprosthesis i
s a reliable choice when a tissue valve is required, especially in pat
ients over 60 years of age.