Y. Osorio et al., REINFECTION IN AMERICAN CUTANEOUS LEISHMANIASIS - EVALUATION OF CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN THE HAMSTER MODEL, Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 93(3), 1998, pp. 353-356
There is no clear understanding of the outcome of reinfection in New W
orld cutaneous leishmaniasis, and its role in the relationship to the
development of protection or secondary disease. For this reason, reinf
ection experiments with homologous (Leishmania panamensis-L. panamensi
s) and heterologous (L. major-L. panamensis) species of leishmaniae we
re conducted in the hamster model. The different protocols for primary
infections prior to the challenge with L. panamensis were as follows:
(a) L. major, single promastigote injection, (b) L. major, three boos
ter infections, (c) L. panamensis, followed by antimonial treatment to
achieve subclinical infection, (d) L. panamensis, with active lesions
, (e) sham infected, naive controls. Although all reinfected hamsters
developed lesions upon challenge, animals with active primary lesions
due to L. panamensis, and receiving booster infections of L. major had
the most benign secondary lesions (58-91% and 69-76% smaller than con
trols, respectively, P<0.05). Subclinically infected animals had inter
mediate lesions (40-64% smaller than controls, P<0.05), while hamsters
which received a single dose of L. major had no significant improveme
nt over controls. Our results suggested that L. major could elicit a c
ross protective response to L. panamensis, and that the presence and n
umber of amastigotes persisting after a primary infection may influenc
e the clinical outcome of reinfections.