Kh. Lim et al., THE CLINICAL UTILITY OF SERUM URIC-ACID MEASUREMENTS IN HYPERTENSIVE DISEASES OF PREGNANCY, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 178(5), 1998, pp. 1067-1071
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to evaluate the clinical utility of serum u
ric acid measurements in the hypertensive diseases of pregnancy. STUDY
DESIGN: We performed a nested case-control study to assess the clinic
al utility of serum uric acid measurements in women with hypertensive
diseases of pregnancy. We identified 344 women who had serum uric acid
measurements at term and categorized them into five diagnostic groups
according to definitions of hypertensive diseases in pregnancy publis
hed by the National Working Group on Hypertension in Pregnancy: transi
ent hypertension of pregnancy (n = 69), preeclampsia (n = 130), chroni
c hypertension (n = 23), chronic hypertension with superimposed preecl
ampsia (n = 29), and normal (n = 93). We compared the mean uric acid c
oncentration for each group with use of a one-way analysis of variance
and Scheffe's post hoc test and calculated the sensitivities and spec
ificities in diagnosing preeclampsia as well as the likelihood ratios
for serum uric acid values of 5.5, 6.0, and 6.5 mg/dl. We also examine
d the correlation between serum uric acid levels and several clinical
outcome measures in women with hypertensive diseases of pregnancy RESU
LTS: The mean serum uric acid values for women with preeclampsia (6.2
+/- 1.4 mg/dl) and transient hypertension (5.6 +/- 1.7 mg/dl) were sig
nificantly higher than those of controls (4.3 +/- 0.8 mg/dl, p < 0.05)
. The difference in mean serum uric acid values between women with chr
onic hypertension (4.9 +/- 1.0 mg/dl) and superimposed preeclampsia (5
.8 +/- 1.4 mg/dl) were not statistically significant. The likelihood r
atio of having preeclampsia with a serum uric acid value of 5.5 mg/dl
was 1.41 in gestational hypertension of pregnancy and 2.5 in chronic h
ypertension. With use of a receiver-operator characteristic curve, we
were unable to identify a serum uric acid value that could be used to
differentiate various hypertensive diseases of pregnancy. There was a
weak correlation between serum uric acid values and several clinical o
utcome measures of preeclampsia (r = 0.06 to 0.26). CONCLUSION: Althou
gh mean serum uric acid values are elevated in women with preeclampsia
, the clinical utility of serum uric acid values in differentiating va
rious hypertensive diseases of pregnancy appears to be limited. In the
setting of chronic hypertension, however, a serum uric acid level of
greater than or equal to 5.5 mg/dl could identify women with an increa
sed likelihood of having superimposed preeclampsia.