BOLUS INJECTION (2-4 MIN) VERSUS SHORT-TERM (10-20 MIN) INFUSION OF 5-FLUOROURACIL IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED COLORECTAL-CANCER - A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL
B. Glimelius et al., BOLUS INJECTION (2-4 MIN) VERSUS SHORT-TERM (10-20 MIN) INFUSION OF 5-FLUOROURACIL IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED COLORECTAL-CANCER - A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL, European journal of cancer, 34(5), 1998, pp. 674-678
The use of bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) as a short-term infusion over 1
0-30 min is increasing at the cost of a push injection, mainly due to
practical advantages. Since even a short prolongation of the administr
ation time results in lower 5-FU peak and area under the curve (AUC) l
evels, there might be a risk of decreased efficacy. The aim of this st
udy was to compare a rapid intravenous (i.v.) 5-FU injection and a sho
rt-term 5-FU infusion with respect to objective responses and toxicity
in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. 203 patients with measur
able advanced colorectal cancer were randomised to bolus 5-FU either a
s an injection for 2-4 min or as a short-term infusion lasting 10-20 m
in. In both groups, the 5-FU dose was 500 mg/m(2) and leucovorin 60 mg
/m(2) was given 40 min after the start of 5-FU. Treatment was given on
two successive days every other week until progression. Objective tum
our regression was seen in 27/100 (27%) in the injection group and in
13/103 (13%) in the infusion group (P=0.02). Severe toxicity was rare
and did not differ significantly between the groups. Progression-free
survival tended to be longer in the injection group (P=0.07), but over
all survival did not differ between the groups. Bolus 5-FU should be a
dministered as a rapid i.v. injection rather than as a short-term infu
sion, since the former rate of administration results in a higher resp
onse rate without being significantly more toxic. (C) 1998 Elsevier Sc
ience Ltd. All rights reserved.