C. Gipps et P. Tunstall, EFFORT, ABILITY AND THE TEACHER - YOUNG CHILDRENS EXPLANATIONS FOR SUCCESS AND FAILURE, Oxford review of education, 24(2), 1998, pp. 149-165
Forty-nine six and seven year-old children in eight Year I and Year 2
classes in London schools were asked a series of questions to probe th
eir understanding of success and failure in relation to mathematics, p
ainting, reading and 'getting on' with work. Responses were categorise
d following, but modifying, Little (1985). Effort was the most commonl
y cited reason for success/failure, and this echoed the teachers' emph
asis in the classroom. Specific competence (being good at a particular
activity) was the second most commonly cited, while general ability w
as rarely mentioned. The role of the teacher in the child's success/fa
ilure was also articulated: it was ranked third equal, but in terms of
frequency was some way behind effort and competence. A powerful messa
ge in these classrooms was that success and failure is linked with eff
ort; the article concludes by arguing that a focus on effort alone, ho
wever, is not sufficient to ensure progress and persistence.