E. Haaskjold et al., CONTRAST SENSITIVITY AFTER IMPLANTATION OF DIFFRACTIVE BIFOCAL AND MONOFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENSES, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 24(5), 1998, pp. 653-658
Purpose: To compare contrast sensitivity (CS) after implantation of a
diffractive bifocal intraocular lens (IOL) and a monofocal IOL of simi
lar design. Setting: Seven European centers. Methods: In this randomiz
ed, prospective study, CS was tested 5 months after cataract and IOL i
mplantation surgery in 115 patients with a diffractive bifocal IOL and
106 patients with a monofocal IOL. It was also tested in a subgroup o
f 38 patients who had bilateral implantation of a diffractive bifocal
IOL. Contrast sensitivity was tested using the Vision Contrast Test Sy
stem (VCTS). Results: In patients with a best corrected visual acuity
(BCVA) of 1.0 or better, the CS at all spatial frequencies (1.5 to 18
cycles/degree), both at distance and near, was slightly lower in the b
ifocal IOL group than in the monofocal group. Mean values were within
the normal range. In patients with a BCVA of less than 1.0, the CS was
lower and the difference between the bifocal and monofocal groups was
less. In patients with bilateral bifocal IOLs, CS was better when tes
ted bilaterally than when testing the better eye alone. ,Pupil size af
fected the results to a small degree. Contrast sensitivity appeared to
improve over time after implantation of a diffractive Conclusions: In
patients with cataract and no other eye pathology, the diffractive bi
focal IOL will slightly reduce the CS at ail spatial frequencies. In t
hose with reduced visual acuity after cataract surgery, CS will be red
uced accordingly In this situation, the reduction from the diffractive
bifocal optic would be minor.