Ml. Mcdermott et al., VISCOELASTIC ADHERENCE TO CORNEAL ENDOTHELIUM FOLLOWING PHACOEMULSIFICATION, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 24(5), 1998, pp. 678-683
Purpose: To compare the residual adherence of viscoelastics to the cor
neal endothelium following phacoemulsification in an in vitro rabbit m
odel. Setting: Departments of Ophthalmology and Anatomy, Wayne State U
niversity, Detroit, Michigan, USA. Methods: Three groups of 10 rabbit
eyes each had a lensectomy via phacoemulsification using sodium hyalur
onate (Amvisc Plus(R), Healon GV(R)) or sodium chondroitin sulfate-sod
ium hyaluronate (Visoat(R)) as the viscoelastic agent. Alter phacoemul
sification and cortex removal, a central corneal block was excised, cr
yofixed, and processed for light and electron microscopy. Viscoelastic
thickness was determined by a calibrated reticule on the light micros
cope or a calibrated measuring program in the electron microscope. The
nonparametric statistical test, Kruskal-Wallis, was used to compare v
iscoelastic groups. Results: Median phacoemulsification time between v
iscoelastic agents was not significantly different. Median viscoelasti
c thicknesses were 13.0 mu m for Amvisc Plus, 0.4 mu m for Healon GV,
and 375.0 mu m for Viscoat, Each was significantly different from the
others (Kruskal-Wallis, P < .001). Conclusions: Median thickness of Am
visc Plus, Healon GV, and Viscoat remaining adherent to the corneal en
dothelium after phacoemulsification as markedly different. Viscoat pro
vided the greatest amount of viscoelastic material adjacent to the cor
neal endothelium.