Theories of weight illusions have traditionally emphasised either the
primary contribution of low-level sensory cues or the role of expectat
ion based on knowledge and past experience. Current models of weight i
llusions lean quite strongly towards sensory-based interpretations. Th
e current experiment raises a problem for such approaches by generatin
g a weight illusion that is difficult to explain other than by the par
ticipants' knowledge. Golfers (who expect a weight difference between
ball types) reliably judged practice golf balls to weigh more than rea
l golf balls of the same weight. In contrast, non-golfers (who expect
no weight difference between ball types) judged practice and real ball
s of equal weight to weigh the same. Furthermore, within the group of
golfers, those who expected the weights of the two ball types to be th
e most discrepant prior to lifting tended to report the strongest illu
sions subsequent to lifting. Because there is no low-level sensory cue
between ball types that on its own would signal a weight difference,
the current finding suggests that there is a top-down component to wei
ght perception that is based on experience with specific objects.