Ibm. Vanderfits et al., POSTURAL ADJUSTMENTS ACCOMPANYING FAST POINTING MOVEMENTS IN STANDING, SITTING AND LYING ADULTS, Experimental Brain Research, 120(2), 1998, pp. 202-216
The present study evaluated the effect of different positions, which v
aried in the amount of bodily support, on postural control during fast
pointing movements. Fourteen adult subjects were studied in standing,
various sitting and lying positions. Multiple surface electromyograms
(EMGs) of arm, neck, trunk and upper leg muscles and kinematics were
recorded during a standard series of unilateral arm movements. Two add
itional series, consisting of bilateral arm movements and unilateral a
rm movements with an additional weight, were performed to assess wheth
er additional task-load affected postural adjustments differently in a
sitting and standing position. Two pointing strategies were used - de
spite identical instructions. Seven subjects showed an elbow extension
throughout the movements. They used the deltoid (DE) as the prime mov
er (DE group). The other seven subjects performed the movement with a
slight elbow flexion and used the biceps brachii (BB) as the prime mov
er (BB group). The two strategies had a differential effect on the pos
tural adjustments: postural activity was less and substantially later
in the BB-group than in the DE group. Anticipatory postural muscle act
ivity was only present in the DE group during stance. In all positions
and task-load conditions the dorsal postural muscles were activated b
efore their ventral antagonists. The activation rate, the timing and -
to a lesser extent - the amplitude of the dorsal muscle activity was
position dependent. The position dependency was mainly found in the ca
udally located lumbar extensor (LE) and hamstrings (HAM) muscles. The
EMG amplitude of LE and HAM was also affected by body geometry (trunk
and pelvis position). Position and body geometry had only a minor effe
ct on the activity of the neck and thoracic extensor muscles. This dif
ference in behaviour of lower and upper postural muscles suggests that
they could serve different postural tasks: the lower muscles being mo
re involved in keeping the centre of mass within the limits of the sup
port surface, and the upper ones in counteracting the reaction forces
generated by movement onset. Increasing task-load by performing bilate
ral movements and - to a minor extent - during loaded unilateral movem
ents affected the temporal and quantitative characteristics of the pos
tural adjustments during standing and sitting in a similar way. The ef
fect was present mainly during the early part of the response (within
100 ms after prime mover onset). This suggests that feedforward or ant
icipatory mechanisms play a major role in the task-specific modulation
of postural adjustments.