K. Danzer et al., COMPARISON OF SOLID SAMPLING SPECTROCHEMICAL METHODS BY MEANS OF MULTIVARIATE-STATISTICS AND INFORMATION-THEORY, Journal of analytical atomic spectrometry, 13(5), 1998, pp. 371-375
Interlaboratory studies and method comparison studies can usually be e
valuated by using univariate statistical procedures. Alternatively, me
thods of multivariate data analysis can be applied to evaluate the rel
iability of methods more generally and simultaneously for all the elem
ents determined by multicomponent analyses. The investigations describ
ed here were carried out to demonstrate the efficiency of multivariate
and information theory evaluation techniques by comparing several mul
ti-element solid sampling methods. Cluster analysis and PCA (principal
component analysis) were used to compare the results of ETV-ICP-OES,
solid sampling AAS, TXRF, de arc spectrometry and dc arc spectrography
by multivariate methods. The results correspond significantly to the
information theory evaluation according to Kerridge-Bongard's inaccura
cy model of information, where both the precision and trueness of the
analytical results are taken into account.