Following the introduction of endoscopic papillotomy and stone extract
ion, surgical bile duct revision has decreased considerably in importa
nce during the past mio decades. Surgical bile duct revision is associ
ated with an appreciably higher rate of complications than endoscopic
stone extraction. The result has been that most working groups now fav
our a ''therapeutic splitting'' approach. This means that, wherever po
ssible, endoscopic revision of the bile duct is first attempted. If, d
uring laparoscopic cholecystectomy, intraoperative cholangiography rev
eals the presence of bile duct stones, they may, after consultation wi
th the endoscopist, be left in place for removal by endoscopic papillo
tomy at some later date. Only in the case of very young patients and e
xceptionally, a highly experienced laparoscopic surgeon may attempt a
transcystic extraction of such stones. Continuing indications for conv
entional surgical treatment of choledocholithiasis are local factors o
bstructing access to the papilla (gastrectomy,, stenosis of the pyloru
s) and other bile duct changes requiring correction (choledochocele, s
trictures, stenoses, Mirizzi's syndrome, overlooked impacted stone obs
tructing an overlong cystic duct stump, intrahepatic lithiasis).