GROWTH AND LOSSES OF PHYTOPLANKTON STUDIED WITH A NEW DIALYSIS CHAMBER TECHNIQUE ALONG THE RIVER SPREE

Authors
Citation
J. Kohler et S. Bosse, GROWTH AND LOSSES OF PHYTOPLANKTON STUDIED WITH A NEW DIALYSIS CHAMBER TECHNIQUE ALONG THE RIVER SPREE, Archiv fur Hydrobiologie, 142(1), 1998, pp. 1-19
Citations number
41
Categorie Soggetti
Marine & Freshwater Biology",Limnology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00039136
Volume
142
Issue
1
Year of publication
1998
Pages
1 - 19
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-9136(1998)142:1<1:GALOPS>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
The development of the main phytoplankton taxa was studied in a water parcel flowing along a 28-km stretch of the lower Spree as well as in simultaneously incubated dialysis chambers. The chambers were continuo usly moved through the water column in order to provide the enclosed a lgae with light of the same mean intensity and of comparable frequency of fluctuations as experienced by the phytoplankton transported downs tream. The difference between the rate of population increase along th e river and the growth rate in dialysis chambers equals the sum of all losses prevented inside the chamber but occurring in the river.Centri c diatoms dominated phytoplankton biomass for the growing season. They grew in their water parcel during downstream flow in spring (+0.13 +/ - 0.25 d(-1)) but declined during summer (-0.79 +/- 0.44 d(-1), each a verage +/- standard deviation). Green algae showed the highest rates o f decline in spring but maintained their abundance most successfully a long the river in summer. The other algal groups declined throughout t he season with a tendency to stronger reductions in summer. The growth rate (= rate of cell replication of caged phytoplankton minus losses inside the chambers) of centric diatoms was higher in spring (0.57 +/- 0.14 d(-1)) than during summer (0.25 +/- 0.13 d(-1)). All the other a lgal groups grew faster in dialysis chambers in summer than in spring. The mean calculated loss rate of total phytoplankton increased from 0 .44 +/- 0.25 d(-1) in spring to 1.05 +/- 0.32 d(-1) during summer. Onl y the chlorophytes maintained losses at a low level (0.41 +/- 0.24 d(- 1)) even in summer. Different intensity of sedimentation and grazing o f benthic filter-feeders may explain longitudinal development of phyto plankton as well as seasonal shifts between diatoms and chlorophytes.