Objective: This practice-based study involved private practitioners wh
o reported on the location of 1,100 sites of clinically diagnosed seco
ndary caries. Method and materials: The secondary caries was noted on
schematic diagrams on which the clinicians made an outline of the rest
oration and marked the location of the caries with a red pen. The seco
ndary caries was classified as being located gingivally, occlusally/in
cisally, or at any other location of the restoration. Results: Overall
, 80% to 90% of the clinically diagnosed secondary caries was reported
to be located gingivally, irrespective of the type of restoration or
restorative material employed. Class II restorations, analyzed separat
ely, showed a slightly higher-relative proportion of occlusal secondar
y caries on resin composite (16%) than on amalgam (8%) restorations. C
onclusion: A number of patient, operator, and material factors may con
tribute to the development of secondary caries and in the differential
diagnosis of marginal discrepancies, including secondary caries, at t
he gingival area of restorations.