Rd. King, LINEAR-MODEL OF NITROGEN-BALANCE AND EXAMINATION OF THE NATURE OF TRUE METABOLIZABLE ENERGY AND ITS NITROGEN CORRECTED FORM, British Poultry Science, 39(1), 1998, pp. 70-78
1. The nature of nitrogen (N) corrected true metabolisable energy (TME
N) was derived using a linear model of N balance, constructed from the
relationship between excreted and ingested N. 2. TME was described in
terms of a regression line, formed from 'fed' points relating energy
voided to energy ingested (GE), as GE -(a(fed) + bGE) + a(fast). On as
signment of theoretical excreta and ingested energy components, a devi
ation from conceptual metabolisable energy (MEc), equal to the differe
nce between a(fed) and a(fast) was established and attributed to metab
olic urinary energy (UmE). 3. The N balance model is based on the form
of relationship between N excreted and N ingested (NI) that exhibits
a linear deviation at 'initial' rates of N ingestion. The model postul
ates the following: The deviation is the result of a sparing effect of
ingested N on the N component of UmE, viz. metabolic urinary N (UmN);
The magnitude of UmN, through 'initial' values of fed N, is described
by an intercept component, a(Np), and a slope quantity, -(b(Nr) - b(N
na)) NI, where b(Nna) and b(Nr) are respectively the slopes of N excre
tion through 'initial' and 'subsequent' rates of ingested food N; The
magnitude of the deviation from zero nitrogen balance (ZNB) through 'i
nitial' and 'subsequent' rates of ingested N is the sum of the previou
s terms and a(Nm) -(1 - b(Nr)) NI, where a(Nm) is the intercept compon
ent representing maintenance losses of N at fasting and (1 - b(Nr)) NI
is the quantity of fed N retained to replace maintenance N loss. 4. A
pplication of the appropriate energetic forms of UmN and a(Nm), viz. E
-t a(Np) - E-t (b(Nr) - b(Nna)) NI and E(u)a(Nm), to the expression fo
r obtaining TME, demonstrated that TME exceeded MEc by the quantities
E-t (b(Nr) - b(Nna)) NI and E-t a(Np), for test food intakes resulting
in 'initial' and 'subsequent' rates of food N, respectively. 5. Appli
cation of appropriate energetic components of the model to simulate co
rrection of TME to ZNB, demonstrated TMEZNB to be a biased quantity, d
eviating from MEc by the amount - E-u (1 - b(Nr)) NI or expressed as a
n excreta energy slope component, b(Eu)(1 - b(Nr) NI/GE)(GE) where E-u
is an appropriate energy coefficient. An alternative perspective is t
hat ZNB correction removes the energetic form of UmN as a source of bi
as, but introduces one related to E(u)a(Nm). Its nature may be perceiv
ed by regarding TME as a function of a regression line relating energy
excreted (EE) to energy ingested that has been corrected for UmN ener
getic bias and is pivoting on a fulcrum vertically aligned with the po
sition of ZNB on the GE (x) axis. The repression line rotates anti-clo
ckwise in response to ZNB correction by an amount equal to the magnitu
de of E(u)a(Nm) measured on the EE (y) axis from the point of intercep
tion. 6. The study identified processes that may be employed to remove
bias and improve precision of TME.