Cb. Govindram et V. Krishnan, ANALYSIS OF COMPLEX SURFACTANT SYSTEMS - A CLASSICAL APPROACH, Tenside, surfactants, detergents, 35(2), 1998, pp. 104-107
This paper describes an analytical method for quantitative estimation
of soap, fatty acid non-ionics, anionics (other than soaps) and amphot
erics when present as mixtures in liquid, gel, laundry and toilet soap
s using classical analytical techniques. The methodology described ove
rcomes the current problems associated with the analysis of mixed surf
actants. Non-ionic surfactant and free fatty acids are separated from
soap and amphoteric surfactant as acetone solubles. Part of the aceton
e solubles is titrated with standard sodium hydroxide solution using p
henolphtalein to determine free fatty acids Another part of acetone so
luble is evaporated after neutralising the free fatty acid with alkali
, the residue dissolved in water and extracted with ethyl acetate. The
residue obtained from ethyl acetate evaporation is weighed as non-ion
ic surfactant. From the acetone insoluble matter; soap along with amph
oteric surfactant and some anionic surfactant (other than soap) is ext
racted with rectified spirit or absolute alcohol. Rectified spirit ext
ract is partially evaporated diluted with water to 50% v/v alcohol con
tent (approximate), split with mineral acid and extracted with petrole
um ether. The petroleum ether extract obtained is washed with sodium b
icarbonate solution to remove anionic surfactant (other than soap) and
amphoteric surfactant and evaporated. The TFM and anhydrous soap are
estimated using the conventional methods [I]. Amphoteric surfactant is
estimated gravimetrically from the aqueous/alcoholic solution obtaine
d after fatty-acid extraction [2]. Anionic surfactant (other than soap
) is determined by two-phase titration with benzethonium chloride (Hya
mine 1622) wing mixed indicator on a separate sample [3,4].