A RANDOMIZED, PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF PAIN AFTER GASLESS LAPAROSCOPY AND TRADITIONAL LAPAROSCOPY

Citation
Rs. Guido et al., A RANDOMIZED, PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF PAIN AFTER GASLESS LAPAROSCOPY AND TRADITIONAL LAPAROSCOPY, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, 5(2), 1998, pp. 149-153
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Obsetric & Gynecology
ISSN journal
10743804
Volume
5
Issue
2
Year of publication
1998
Pages
149 - 153
Database
ISI
SICI code
1074-3804(1998)5:2<149:ARPCOP>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Study Objective. To compare pain after laparoscopic tubal ligation by gasless laparoscopy versus carbon dioxide (CO2) pneumoperitoneum. Desi gn. Prospective, randomized, single-blind comparison (Canadian Task Fo rce classification I). Setting. Private obstetric-gynecology hospital associated with a university resident teaching program. Patients. Wome n age 21 to 42. Intervention. Single-puncture laparoscopic tubal ligat ion was performed with a silicone elastomer band. Gasless laparoscopy was performed with a Laprolift and traditional laparoscopy with CO2 pn eumoperitoneum. Postoperative pain in the shoulder and periumbilical a nd lower pelvic regions was measured by visual analog scale on the day of surgery and postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 7, and 14. Measurements an d Main Results. Oi the 67 patients, 54 provided visual analog scales f or analysis, 30 in the gasless group and 24 in the traditional group. No statistical difference was seen in scores for shoulder, periumbilic al, and pelvic pain between techniques. Conclusion. Patients undergoin g gasless laparoscopy and traditional laparoscopy experience similar p ostoperative pain.