Rs. Guido et al., A RANDOMIZED, PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF PAIN AFTER GASLESS LAPAROSCOPY AND TRADITIONAL LAPAROSCOPY, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, 5(2), 1998, pp. 149-153
Study Objective. To compare pain after laparoscopic tubal ligation by
gasless laparoscopy versus carbon dioxide (CO2) pneumoperitoneum. Desi
gn. Prospective, randomized, single-blind comparison (Canadian Task Fo
rce classification I). Setting. Private obstetric-gynecology hospital
associated with a university resident teaching program. Patients. Wome
n age 21 to 42. Intervention. Single-puncture laparoscopic tubal ligat
ion was performed with a silicone elastomer band. Gasless laparoscopy
was performed with a Laprolift and traditional laparoscopy with CO2 pn
eumoperitoneum. Postoperative pain in the shoulder and periumbilical a
nd lower pelvic regions was measured by visual analog scale on the day
of surgery and postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 7, and 14. Measurements an
d Main Results. Oi the 67 patients, 54 provided visual analog scales f
or analysis, 30 in the gasless group and 24 in the traditional group.
No statistical difference was seen in scores for shoulder, periumbilic
al, and pelvic pain between techniques. Conclusion. Patients undergoin
g gasless laparoscopy and traditional laparoscopy experience similar p
ostoperative pain.