DOG AND CAT BITES - EPIDEMIOLOGIC ANALYSES SUGGEST DIFFERENT PREVENTION STRATEGIES

Citation
Gr. Patrick et Km. Orourke, DOG AND CAT BITES - EPIDEMIOLOGIC ANALYSES SUGGEST DIFFERENT PREVENTION STRATEGIES, Public health reports, 113(3), 1998, pp. 252-257
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath","Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath
Journal title
ISSN journal
00333549
Volume
113
Issue
3
Year of publication
1998
Pages
252 - 257
Database
ISI
SICI code
0033-3549(1998)113:3<252:DACB-E>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Objective. To examine the characteristics of reported dog and cat bite incidents in EI Paso, Texas, and their implications for local bite pr evention programs, Methods. The authors reviewed a random sample of re ported dog bites and ail reported cat bites in Ei Paso, Texas, in 1995 using existing animal control surveillance data, Results. The majorit y of cat bites (89.4%) were provoked, with females (57.5%) and adults (68.3%) more likely to be victims than males or children. in contrast, just under half of dog bites (44.6%) were provoked, with males (65.6% ) and children (63%) more likely to be victims than females or adults, Dogs that had not been vaccinated for rabies were involved in 65% of dog bites and cats that had not been vaccinated for rabies were involv ed in 92% of cat bites. Conclusion. Effective bite prevention programs should address the finding that bath restrained and unrestrained dogs may bite even when unprovoked and that unrestrained cats usually bite when provoked.