Aim: We evaluated a Siemens software of flow quantification (FQ) by MR
phase mapping, in the framework of a common practical use. Methods: E
xperiments with a laminar flow phantom and in vivo pulsatile flow were
performed. In particular, FQ in ascending aorta was investigated in h
ealthy volunteers. Results and conclusion: Flow phantom experiments re
veal that the FQ slightly underestimates (8% on the average) actual ve
locities (mean velocities over a vessel area), and also that velocity
uncertainties are related to the encoding velocity value, whatever the
measured velocity. Furthermore, using well characterized working crit
eria, we found low intraobserver variability and negligible interobser
ver variability in ascending aorta FQs. The role played by the choice
of reference area in FQ accuracy is emphasized. When recording several
cardiac cycles during the same acquisition, it is shown that the FQ s
oftware may provide erroneous results. Several comments for FQ softwar
e use in the ascending aorta are added. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Irel
and Ltd. All rights reserved.