This study examined the effects of a history of responding under a dif
ferential-reinforcement-of-low-rate 60-s schedule on subsequent respon
ding under a fixed-ratio 10 schedule in rats. Additionally, the effect
s of a fixed-ratio 10 history on responding under a differential-reinf
orcement-of-low-rate 60-s schedule were investigated. The most promine
nt finding was that a differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedule
history resulted in rats emitting significantly lower response rates a
nd longer post-reinforcement pauses under the subsequent fixed-ratio s
chedule. These effects lasted for at least 35 sessions. in contrast, a
history of responding under the fixed-ratio IO schedule produced only
a transient (15 sessions) elevation in the rate of responding when th
e rats subsequently responded under the differential-reinforcement-of-
low-rate 60-s schedule, relative to rats without a history of respondi
ng under the fixed-ratio 10. These data demonstrate that responding ma
intained under ratio contingencies is susceptible to long-lasting infl
uence by historical factors. The magnitude and longevity of these effe
cts are, in many cases, more potent than those previously obtained wit
h fixed-interval schedules. This challenges the notion that ratio perf
ormance is relatively less sensitive than interval performance to hist
orical factors. (C) 1998 Academic Press.